有消息了：
During this process, your manuscript returned a similarity score of 35%. We reviewed the report, which is attached. Please note that instances of similarity can include both text recycling (also known as self-plagiarism) and the reuse of another author’s words or ideas without sufficient attribution. We cannot make an acceptance decision at this point because of this level of overlap. However, because the editorial team and peer reviewers identified strengths and novelty in your work, we are willing to consider a revision once this overlapping text has been addressed.
Reviewers’ Comments to Author:
Reviewer: 3
Comments to the Author
The author has improved and address all the critical comments.
Reviewer: 1
Comments to the Author
I thank the authors for their thorough responses to my comments.
Reviewer: 2
Comments to the Author
My comments were addressed.
Editor’s Comments to Author:
Editor
Comments to the Author:
There is high similarity and please try to revise the manuscript to decrease it.
还要去降重，尴尬了
有消息了：
During this process, your manuscript returned a similarity score of 35%. We reviewed the report, which is attached. Please note that instances of similarity can include both text recycling (also known as self-plagiarism) and the reuse of another author’s words or ideas without sufficient attribution. We cannot make an acceptance decision at this point because of this level of overlap. However, because the editorial team and peer reviewers identified strengths and novelty in your work, we are willing to consider a revision once this overlapping text has been addressed.
Reviewers' Comments to Author:
Reviewer: 3
Comments to the Author
The author has improved and address all the critical comments.
Reviewer: 1
Comments to the Author
I thank the authors for their thorough responses to my comments.
Reviewer: 2
Comments to the Author
My comments were addressed.
Editor's Comments to Author:
Editor
Comments to the Author:
There is high similarity and please try to revise the manuscript to decrease it.
还要去降重，尴尬了
Briefings in Bioinformatics审稿过程如下：
2022-08-14 19:37, Awaiting Admin Processing2022-08-15 16:26, Awaiting ME assignment2022-08-15 18:14, Awaiting Editor Assignment2022-08-16 07:06 ~ 2022-08-25 18:42, ADM: XXX; Awaiting Reviewer Assignment2022-08-26 08:26 ~ 2022-09-06 08:00, ADM: XXX; Awaiting Reviewer Scores2022-09-06 21:10 ~ 2022-09-30 21:00, ADM: XXX; Major Revision (06-Sep-2022), Due on: 04-Oct-2022。3位审稿人，1位推荐直接接收，2位major。9月30号提交responses。2022-09-30 21:00 ~ 2022-10-03 07:00, ADM: XXX; Awaiting Admin Processing2022-10-03 12:00 ~ 2022-11-07 07:00, ADM: XXX; Awaiting Admin Scores, 很快就变成Awaiting Reviewer Scores2022-11-07 20:00 ~ 2022-11-08 00:00, Awaiting Reviewer Assignment。有可能是之前的审稿人没有同意审阅返修稿件；也有可能是编辑换了一个审稿人（比如征求新的意见）。2022-11-08 12:00 ~ 2022-11-15 08:00, Awaiting Reviewer Scores。2022-11-15 17:00 ~ 2022-11-15 19:30, Awaiting Decision。2022-11-15 19:30 ~ 2022-11-30 01:00, Accept (15-Nov-2022) Awaiting Production Checklist。在很短的时间内，Awaiting Production Checklist的状态会消失，同时多了一个editor（我估计是负责格式/内容的校对润色工作；负责安排出版等）。2022-11-30 01:00 ~ 2022-11-30 17:00: Receive Proof Email（此时投稿系统没有任何提示；仅通讯作者可以收到邮件）。官网要求最好在48h完成。2022-11-30下午16:50完成Proof Submit。2022-12-26 ~ 2022-12-28: 由于较忙，通讯作者没注意到bib编辑部邮件，该个过程延后了1周左右。需要通讯作者确定Proof（排版好的PDF）准确无误；确定出版License。最终Published online。2023-01-14：被Web of Science数据库Science Citation Index Expanded收录。当天会收到一个通知邮件（[email protected]）2023-01-19：Published with volume and issue number.难受啊，看大家的Awaiting Decision状态都是最多2天甚至当天就有结果，而我已经好几天了，不会凉了吧(´இ皿இ｀)
又来打扰博主了，我的在2月22号被接收啦，历时2个月。接收后的两三天内让上传更新版也叫final版的文件，但我在上传的时候，figure 链接给的不太对，在pdf proof版本不会暴露问题，但提交后，发现网站上的在线版链接的乱七八糟。于是给杂志社写了信，想申请重新上传，但一周后也木收到邮件，系统也木有变动。想问问小姐姐，在online时，还会有机会校正一次吗
这个没什么经验喔~我之前也只是在杂志的系统上proof，没有关注过图片链接的问题。 你继续联系杂志社吧 ~ 另外，我不是小姐姐
好，谢谢博主，看照片以为是小姐姐，不好意思~
投稿的时候这个博客给了我很大的帮助，前几天文章刚接受，我把我整个时间节点发出来供大家参考。
2023.8.24 Submitted to the Journals
2023.8.25 Awaiting ME assignment
2023.8.31 Awaiting reviewer assignment
2023.10.5 Awaiting Editor Recommendation
2023.10.12 Awaiting Final Decision
2023.10.13 Major Revision（一个月以内）
2023.11.4 Awaiting Admin Processing
2023.11.6 Awaiting Reviewer Selection
2023.11.9 Awaiting Reviewer Scores
2023.12.31 Awaiting Editor Recommendation
2024.1.10 Awaiting Decision
2024.1.11 Minor Revision（两周以内）
2024.1.13 Awaiting Admin Processing
2024.1.15 Awaiting Reviewer Selection
2024.1.19 Awaiting Editor Recommendation
2024.1.28 Awaiting Decision
2024.1.30 Accept
感谢大佬的分享
原来Awaiting Editor Recommendation要这么久的吗
Awaiting Reviewer Scores 后20+天又变回Awaiting Reviewer Assignment
现在已经反复变换3次了TAT
现在状态如何啦？
已经反复变换4次QAQ
大修后接收概率高吗
经验不多。不管是什么杂志，major revision都算是利好吧，说明编辑觉得稿子不错；不然就reject了。如果你有大修就认真改，基本上问题不大的
我在Major Revision后返修，目前Awaiting Reviewer Scores已有20天了，正常吗。有点紧张
耐心等待吧
变Awaiting Decision了
今天明天就出结果了，加油
内心慌的一批啊
还没结果啊
估计是在讨论吧。。。耐心等待吧
有消息了：
During this process, your manuscript returned a similarity score of 35%. We reviewed the report, which is attached. Please note that instances of similarity can include both text recycling (also known as self-plagiarism) and the reuse of another author’s words or ideas without sufficient attribution. We cannot make an acceptance decision at this point because of this level of overlap. However, because the editorial team and peer reviewers identified strengths and novelty in your work, we are willing to consider a revision once this overlapping text has been addressed.
Reviewers’ Comments to Author:
Reviewer: 3
Comments to the Author
The author has improved and address all the critical comments.
Reviewer: 1
Comments to the Author
I thank the authors for their thorough responses to my comments.
Reviewer: 2
Comments to the Author
My comments were addressed.
Editor’s Comments to Author:
Editor
Comments to the Author:
There is high similarity and please try to revise the manuscript to decrease it.
还要去降重，尴尬了
感觉审稿有点宽松，你走运了 ~ 我有几个建议哈： 1. 你写作的时候尽量不要copy自己或者copy别人，那本身是一种学术不端的行为；很多杂志在送审前会查重的，有查重问题很容易被拒稿。如果你真的觉得自己有查重问题，应该在投稿前自己查一下，让别人指出来其实不好。 2. 从头遂字写到尾的论文基本不存在查重问题，这个简单粗暴的技巧以后可以参考下。祝好！ ୧(๑•̀⌄•́๑)૭
如果我真的大段COPY我也就认了，我看了他们查重，很多无语的地方，包括作者单位，包括参考文献，以及在方法学部分一些通用的语句都算我重了
那你加油，慢慢改，快接收啦
完成闭环。已接收！查重的问题主要在于作者单位，地址和邮箱，方法学部分，自己用同样的查重系统再次查重，主体结果部分重复率是13%，单篇最高2%。跟编辑发信后仔细解释说明，第二天收到接收函。BIB的编辑还是很NICE高效的。最后感谢楼主的一直细心解答指导！非常感谢
强
您好我的major之后，awaiting desicion已经一天了，但是出了一个状况，我收到了bib的审稿邀请，但我的状态还是awaiting desicion，已经两天了，不知道怎么办
你好，大家一审大概要多久时间呢
我当时是10天 (～￣▽￣)～
谢谢博主，一审2周回来了，Major Revision
加油！一定可以中的！
借博主吉言，接好运(ฅ´ω`ฅ)
您好，我的awaiting decision已经两天了，现在非常紧张。我的都是原创应该不存在查重问题啊，3月份我博士毕业论文的时候我查过重，这个部分只有0.几%，所以我现在非常压力大。但是我虽然没有accept，已经收到了bib的审稿邀请，我感觉这个很奇怪啊。
如果研究方向确实不太适合审稿，礼貌地回绝即可；如果适合审稿，审一下也无妨。我个人倾向于暂时不要将审稿工作与投稿相挂钩，因为这是无法求证的事，还是顺其自然。如果awating decision的时间过长（比如超过1周），可以发个邮件咨询下。另外，近期是圣诞节前后，不知道这个有没有很大的影响。
确实，给的minor，然后又反修了，r2还要再给审稿人看，一共三句修改，我直接哭了。。。
也还好啦，加油！
嗯嗯，已经接收啦！谢谢解答鸭
从我投稿的时间表可以看到，从Awaiting Decision到Accept的时间间隔是很短的，但你的间隔稍长。估计就是因为你有查重问题，编辑部内部讨论了一下要不要拒收。你这个真的险过剃头，下次最好不要这样 Σ( ° △ °|||)︴
谢谢你的建议~
有结果了吗 我的都一个月了 还在等意见返回
估计快了吧，再耐心等等 ~ 我之前也差不多是1个多月才回来的
哦哦 好的 感谢🙏
请问下，Awaiting Editor Recommendation 这个状态要持续多久啊
你好，版面费交了多少阿
我的paper接收时，bib未实行全面open-source。所以当时我选的是免费的license。今年好像没有免费license了 Σ(っ °Д °;)っ
博主，不好意思再打扰你一次。上传文件时，直接上传带高亮的版本就可以了吗，需不需要上传不带有高亮的版本啊。还有就是补充材料里的修改需不需要高亮啊。
我的response以及manuscript修改都是有高亮的，甚至还有其它标记、超链接等。因为我希望reviewer可以很快看到我想要他们重点看到的东西。 总体原则：排版整洁清晰、内容逻辑顺畅。祝好
好的，再次感谢！
据我所知，response是没有固定的模板和样式的。本质上这只是一次communication。如果某个技巧可以让进行得其更加容易，你不妨使用它。
十分感谢建议🙏